This is fairly obvious but worth setting out. Over lunch, I set up the statsguru on cricinfo to list all the tests which have been played since 1999 to work out the number of players for each country which have been (i) world beaters and (ii) world class. The former being people like lara, the latter being people like Hayden. For each country here goes:
SA - (i) Donald, Kallis, Pollock
(ii) Smith, Ntini
Ind - (i) Dravid, Tenduklar
(ii) Dhoni, Sewag, Ganguly, Laxman, Harbajan, kumble
SL - (i) Jayasuriya, Muralitharan
(ii) sangakara, Jayawardene
NZ - (i)
(ii) Fleming, Vettori, Cairns
Zim - (i) Andy Flower
(ii) streak
WI - (i) Ambrose, Lara, Walsh
(ii) Chanderpaul, Gayle
Pak - (i) Akram, Waqar
(ii) Mushtaq, Inzamam, Mohammed Yusuf, Saeed Anwar, Younis Kahn
Aus - (i) Ponting, S Waugh, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath
(ii) Hayden, Langer, M Waugh, Martyn, Lee, Gillespie, McGill, Clarke, Hussey
England, however, is impossible to judge given our nationality....
Who do we think?
I'd suggest
(i) nobody
(ii) Flintoff, Stewart, Gough, Atherton, Caddick, Trescothick, Hoggard, Vaughan, Thorpe, Pietersen, Hussein.
This might explain why we kept losing the ashes but we were pretty good against all other teams.
God, this analysis is painfully obvious isn't it. I'll post it anyway to see if it can induce some comments. Ben, you are free to apply the 'cuntometer' to the list if you so choose.