Should 'bradmanesque' become a word; or should the word really be 'Vaughanesque'?
Or should Aussies just fuck off?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A rabble of ill-informed blow-hards spit their cricket-related diatribes of cuntishness onto an unsuspecting public.
King Cricket
Cricinfo England cricket news
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(50)
-
▼
September
(27)
- Hatin' Hayden
- tweaking
- Sri Lanka B
- WELL PUT KING CRICKETHAYDEN:“I think this series i...
- WELL PUT KING CRICKETHAYDEN:“I think this series i...
- this is disturbing. (from king cricket.) look at h...
- Game
- This was just after Mr Ryder put his hand through ...
- No title
- King Cricket
- Vox
- This is quite interesting...
- disturbing...
- Stanford- lover of the game or emissary of satan?
- family members on film
- I think that this is my dad 'starring' in the film...
- Is that 22 yards?
- Young jarman
- Young jarms
- Cigarettes and, probably, alcohol.
- Pass the toast rack
- who turns it more?
- bradmanesque
- That was village; utter village.
- Ian Bell
- Warne and McGrath
- England's cricketing conundrum
-
▼
September
(27)
1 comment:
If Bradmanesque means "in the manner of Don Bradman" and Vaughanesque means "in the manner of Michael Vaughan", they can't, by definition, mean the same thing, surely?
Aussies should just fuck off though - that's a nail on the head.
Post a Comment