a day ahead

so, i'm here before you all. what to write about? hmmm.

i think i'll discuss SA and their cunt ratings.

so, here goes

Smith - surprising, not so much of one;
Gibbs - massive one;
Kallis - looks like rollinson;
de Villiers - not sure?
Duminy - ok - has an earring that makes him look like a bit of a dick;
Boucher - crys a lot;
Morkel - shit;
Botha - no idea;
Merwe - no idea either;
Parnell - seems ok.

in conclusion, this was a little disappointing for me. i would like to think they're all wankers, but they're ok - except gibbs. who may be enough of a cunt to cancel out the ok-ish-ness of the rest.

the real problem lies with the sa fan, who appears to have taken on the 'australian' mantel for being a) supporter of the best team in the world; 2) telling everyone that sa are the best in the world, and that the sooner the rest of us stop playing cricket and therefore acknowledge the rightful place of sa as the best in the world the better; and 3) accusing everyone else of cheating because sa loose.

which brings me onto strauss:

1) is a soothsayer;
2) therefore knows when to call a player back or allow a runner, because he know exactly when the WILL be out;
3) therefore laughs in the face of 'the spirit of the game';
4) and therefore, is a bad captain.

At least, that's what one sa blogger implied. cunts, you see. as if:

1) smith would have done any different;
2) that strauss needs to be consulted for every decision the umpires make;
3) is going against 'the spirit' by not letting a fat smith have someone else do the hard work for him;
4) has just won the ashes;
5) is batting rather well.