Katich: 3/5
Hughes: 5/5
Ponting: duh
Clarke: 4/5
Hussey: 1/5
North: 3/5
Haddin: 4/5
Johnson: 2/5
Siddle: 6/5
Hilfenhaus: 1/5
Hauritz: 2/5
So the conclusions are that Siddle is the new Ponting and Hilfenhaus is the new Hussey. I reckon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
i'm sort of thinking 5/5 for all of them, except haddin cheats, so he's on 6. ponting 7. johnston 6 - just for being goofy. and siddle 8 for that face hair, and for the gay barge on broad.
why when other teams save a game against us we can't bowl, but when we save a game, it's about luck or time wasting. i.e. not down to hard work.
Rather than slag ponting off myself, I'd rather leave it to the Australian readers of the Melbourne Herald Sun. They seem to like ponting less than we do:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/comments/0,22023,25771607-2882,00.html
Hifelhaus looks like howard moon. I quite like him. I quite like Simon Katich as well: but I prefer the 2005 version (who was rubbish).
Siddle, however, is profoundly objectionable.
Jarms was at sophia gardens yesterday, so I'm expecting a full report at some point today.
Australians say 'look' at the start of sentences a lot.
We deserved that after the away WI series (and actually after last summer against SA when we were a bit unlucky I thought). I'm sure/hope our top order won't play so badly again. However, what was worrying was that the Australians had thought out our top 5 and had accurate enough bowlers to execute their plans.
I agree with all of that.
Post a Comment